Powered by Roundtable

SMU's 2026 blueprint reveals a calculated roster build, prioritizing buy-in and development over flash to conquer the ACC.

Talking about a season that’s still a year away is usually how you end up with cold takes and warmer beer.

But when it comes to SMU football and 2026, the temptation is understandable. The pieces are lining up in a way that makes it hard not to look ahead - cautiously optimistic, but optimistic all the same.

Start with the schedule.

It’s about as friendly as an ACC slate can be without being insulting. Yes, road trips to Notre Dame and Florida State loom large, and sure, you can pencil those in as uphill climbs. But after that? There’s a whole lot of “handle your business” football.

Home games against teams you should beat. Road games, you should be prepared for. One or two spots where things could get weird if you’re not locked in.

That’s the key phrase: if you’re not locked in.

Because when SMU is right - mentally, culturally, schematically - it has shown it can be an absolute nightmare to play. The losses that sting aren’t the ones where the other team was simply better.

They’re the ones where SMU tripped over its own shoelaces. Clean that up, and suddenly nine wins feels like the floor, not the ceiling.

And that’s where the transfer portal conversation gets interesting.

There’s been plenty of chatter about SMU assembling what some jokingly call a “Group of Five Avengers” roster.

The punchline misses the point. History shows that SMU’s biggest portal hits haven’t always come with the loudest recruiting graphics. They’ve come from hungry, proven players who knew how to work, knew how to listen, and weren’t walking in expecting to be treated like royalty.

In fact, some of the flashiest Power Four additions in recent cycles didn’t move the needle nearly as much as the under-the-radar guys who simply fit.

Production, toughness, and mindset have mattered far more than logos on old helmets. That’s not an accident — it’s evaluation.

The portal, for all its chaos, is still about people. You can measure speed, size, and stats. You can’t fake buy-in.

One wrong personality can throw off an entire room, even if he’s only there for a year. SMU’s staff seems increasingly aware of that reality, even when it costs them a splashy name.

And that restraint matters, especially in the NIL era.

Yes, SMU has resources. No, that doesn’t mean every position needs to be rented at a premium rate. Overpaying for one season of production can create more problems than it solves, especially when it blocks development or disrupts chemistry. Sustainable success doesn’t come from winning the portal press conference — it comes from building rooms that grow together.

That’s why high school recruiting still matters here. That’s why continuity still matters. And that’s why the idea of quarterbacks, linemen, and skill players growing together over multiple seasons still feels like the secret sauce.

You can rent wins. You can even rent relevance. But if you want to stay relevant, you have to develop something that lasts longer than a one-year contract.

SMU appears to understand that balance better than most. Plug holes where necessary. Bet on development where possible. Protect the culture at all costs.

If they do that - and if the schedule breaks the way it should - don’t be surprised if 2026 looks less like a leap of faith and more like the natural next step. Winning consistently has a funny way of turning long-term plans into expectations.

And in college football, expectations are where programs find out who they really are.