I mean, the next question that's a natural sort of from the Wall Street adoption of Bitcoin via the ETF and other things is obviously, which I did not have on my bingo card, if we're being honest, the rapid politicization of Bitcoin and the crypto space and how much it's become a key issue in this election. I always believed it would become a key issue in an election. But this happened really, really fast and seems to be driving not only Trump's narrative, RFK's narrative to some degree as well, but certainly now a response and a bit of a pivot from the White House, the current administration, because of fear of losing that entire constituent, part of the constituency. Yeah. I think that this is a phenomenal example of two theoretical value drivers for this asset, which is one, the game theory. So we're seeing the game theory play out at the biggest stage it's ever played out at, which is a U.S. presidential election. And the other is the power that something like Bitcoin places in the hands of the people. So think about that for a second. Trump is doing this because he wants votes. How can you get the buy-in from tens of millions of individuals supporting Bitcoin? Think about it. It's because Satoshi put this thing on a mailing list, made sure it worked, and walked away. Bitcoin's already distributed. 19 million of it's already been created. It's already in the hands of the people. The Bitcoin held on exchanges is at an all-time low. It's implying that people are sovereignly holding this physical bear instrument with themselves. And that has given us, the people, the power to effectively say, if you want to be the president of this country, you've got to support us. When was the last time the individuals had that level of power to determine the outcome of a U.S. presidential election on topics such as monetary policy, technology regulation? Silicon Valley's always had a tough time with the White House, with Washington, D.C. Zuckerberg and these guys have always had a really tough time with the White House. All of a sudden, the White House is supporting us. It's because Bitcoin's put the power with the individual. To contrast that, what if Satoshi created this thing and said, went to Goldman Sachs and said, I'd like to list it publicly, right? And I'd like to list Bitcoin publicly and distribute it through the public markets on the NASDAQ. Well, then Bitcoin might be more controlled by BlackRock, Goldman Sachs. The supply would have been distributed to Wall Street first. Does that make sense? So the fact that this thing was a bottoms-up movement, it was so ingenious by Satoshi. I don't know if he did that on purpose, but it's empowering the individual. So this whole notion that Bitcoin puts the power to the people, I think is a great example of that. Trump, you want to win the election? You want our support? You got to support Bitcoin. You got to support proper regulation, proper monetary policy and acknowledge us. That's unbelievable. And then I think the game theory, the Bitcoin game theory is super simple. You're better off on its team than against it, right? It's like the Michael Jordan. You might as well play on the Bulls because you're playing against the Bulls. You're going to lose. And so the game theory and the power to the people, this is the best example at the biggest stage, I think.