With this 4.0.0 update we have noticed that several users have commented on their opinions about it, some positive and others negative. Those that I have been able to read talk about a supposed cronyism between very old BBS users and BBS moderators or administrators, although it is true that many of the moderators are no longer, it is no secret that the oldest BBS users have been added so fast since they are considered content creators within BBS, apart from their excellent work when it comes to publishing or clearing up any vague idea of ​​any user.

Although it can be seen that these users do not publish as often a day on BBS, they were included due to their quality when publishing the content.

For many, believing that quantity makes quality is not true, it is no secret that most users repeat ideas or rethink ideas from having read from another wall, that is why I keep saying that as a community we must be reciprocal and support each other, it is difficult but it is possible, there are no easy roads or cronyism... (or it has not yet been demonstrated) what there is is perseverance and effort to make BBS better.

Hopefully the already whitelisted users expose different content and not replicate information that any moderator has offered, but they can also write, internalize with words the future changes that the platform wants.

I see a lot of guiders, or BBS philosophers but I don't see proposals or new ideas that can be added to a future change.

As before I commented, adding music or any positive adaptation for BBS will serve to make the platform stronger.

Floux Jaffa