Marlins fans question Bruce Sherman’s spending after the payroll gap with the Dodgers surfaces, fueling debate over revenue reinvestment and competitiveness.
When the Miami Marlins owner Bruce Sherman declared, “We want to win. W-I-N. Period,” the reaction across social media wasn’t applause. It was arithmetic.
The reported 2026 payroll figures tell the story plainly. The Los Angeles Dodgers are carrying a payroll of roughly $390 million. The Marlins are operating at $78 million. That $312 million difference is not merely a competitive gap. It reflects a fundamental difference in organizational philosophy.
The defense of Sherman’s approach often begins with market size. Los Angeles benefits from a massive television deal and one of the most lucrative regional sports networks in baseball. Forbes estimates that the Dodgers generate more than $700 million in annual revenue and routinely post operating income exceeding $100 million, even while running one of the highest payrolls in professional sports.
Miami does not operate on that scale. Forbes' valuations in recent years have estimated the Marlins’ annual revenue at $300 to $350 million. That is significantly less than Los Angeles, but it is not insignificant. When the Marlins run a $78 million payroll against that revenue range, they are committing roughly a quarter of their income to major league player salaries. The Dodgers, by contrast, routinely allocate more than half of their revenue to payroll.
That discrepancy is not dictated solely by market size. It is dictated by choice.
Sherman has said the ownership group has not taken profits out of the organization during his tenure and continues to make significant investments. But significant compared to what? Since purchasing the club in 2017, ownership has overseen multiple roster teardowns, consistently ranked among the bottom tier in payroll, and just one full-season playoff appearance. Improvement last season, when the Marlins added 17 wins and lingered near contention, was encouraging. But climbing from a low baseline is not the same as establishing sustained competitiveness.
President of baseball operations Peter Bendix has emphasized sustainability and long-term vision. Talent development is essential to that vision. However, development is not meant to replace spending; it is meant to enhance it. Championship-caliber organizations pair homegrown production with deadline aggression and a willingness to absorb contracts when contention is within reach.
Competing in a division that includes the New York Mets and the Philadelphia Phillies requires more than optimism and internal growth. It requires financial urgency when an opportunity presents itself. To this point, the Marlins have largely avoided that level of commitment.
Sherman insists the goal is winning. The payroll figures suggest caution.
The frustration among fans is not born from envy of big markets. It stems from years of restrained spending paired with promises of future contention. Until payroll allocation reflects the ambition ownership publicly describes, skepticism will continue to follow every declaration of intent.
Winning may be the stated objective. The balance sheet, so far, tells a more restrained story.
ㅤ
Join our ROUNDTABLE community! It's completely free to join. Share your thoughts, engage with our Roundtable writers, and chat with fellow members.
Download the free Roundtable APP, and stay even more connected!