Caleb Wilson Is a Four. And That’s What Makes Him Interesting.

There is an interesting debate among Bulls fans about whether Caleb Wilson is really a four or simply another version of Matas Buzelis. I think the distinction is clearer than it is sometimes presented: Matas is fundamentally a three who can play the four, while Wilson is a four who can play the five.

Buzelis' 2025-26 shot profile reflects a perimeter-oriented forward, with 51.4% of his field-goal attempts coming from three. His offensive game is built around spacing, attacking closeouts, transition and finishing rather than consistently creating from the post.

Wilson's game is almost the inverse. At North Carolina he averaged 19.8 points and 9.4 rebounds while shooting 57.8% from the field, with much of his production coming around the basket, in the post, on the offensive glass and at the free-throw line. Only 9.2% of his field-goal attempts came from three, highlighting just how different his offensive profile was from Buzelis. NBA’s draft profile also identified his interior scoring, rebounding and developing face-up game as important parts of his offensive projection.

The most intriguing part of Wilson's offensive game, however, is what he can do once he establishes position in the post. Synergy data cited in pre-draft analysis had him producing approximately 1.17 points per possession on post-ups, placing him in the 92nd percentile. Other statistical analysis has put his post shooting around 59%. Those numbers suggest this wasn't simply an athletic player taking advantage of smaller college defenders; his post possessions were consistently producing efficient outcomes.

What makes that production particularly interesting is the range of solutions Wilson already has. He can attack from the left block, use a reverse pivot to change direction, turn over either shoulder, face the defender before driving, sell a shot fake and go underneath, spin away from pressure or use a turnaround jumper when the defender takes away the lane. He can also gather off two feet and use his explosiveness to finish after creating even a small amount of separation. Pre-draft scouting analysis highlighted the progression of these moves throughout his freshman season, while also identifying balance and consistency on some of his more difficult jumpers as areas for improvement.

There is another useful number here. Pre-draft Synergy analysis had Wilson's combined post scoring and passing possessions at approximately 1.15 points per possession, around the 88th percentile. That matters because the value of a good post player isn't limited to scoring. Once a defender has to send help, the post can become the starting point for creating an open shot elsewhere on the floor.

That distinction matters in today's NBA. So much offensive creation begins with a perimeter player handling the ball, attacking a switch or operating out of a pick-and-roll. Wilson potentially gives a team another way to create an advantage. Instead of starting 25 feet from the basket, he can begin with the ball on the block and make the defender react to his footwork, strength, counters and explosiveness.

The comparison with recent high-level prospects is useful, although it should not be overstated. Paolo Banchero entered the NBA with a much more developed perimeter creation game, but his ability to score from the post was also an important component of his offensive profile. Wilson is not at that level as an overall creator, but the efficiency of his college post game suggests there is a legitimate skill worth developing rather than simply a temporary advantage created by superior athleticism.

His three-point shooting remains the biggest swing skill. Wilson made only seven of 27 attempts from three at North Carolina, so there is no basis yet for assuming he will become a high-level NBA shooter. His strong Summer League shooting was encouraging, but a small number of games cannot establish that the underlying issue has been solved. What matters is that Wilson doesn't necessarily need to become a high-volume three-point shooter. If he becomes merely credible enough to punish defenders for completely ignoring him, the value of his post game increases significantly.

That is why I think the positional distinction between Wilson and Buzelis matters. Buzelis' offensive profile is that of a perimeter forward who can operate at the four. Wilson's is that of an interior-oriented four whose perimeter game is still developing. Calling them both "forwards" is technically correct, but it misses the difference in how they create advantages.

The argument for Wilson isn't that he is already an elite NBA post scorer. It is that he has the foundations of a potentially elite post game at an unusually young age. The efficiency numbers, the variety of his counters and the fact that he was already generating offense through multiple post actions make it one of the most intriguing aspects of his projection.

And that's where Bulls fans should get excited. The league has become exceptionally good at defending the actions that every team wants to run. Wilson potentially gives Chicago a weapon that asks a different question. Put a smaller defender on him and he can attack the mismatch. Put a bigger defender on him and his footwork gives him an opportunity to attack their mobility. Send help and he can potentially turn the post into a passing opportunity. Stay home and you are asking a 6-foot-10 athlete with an unusually diverse set of post moves to beat his defender.

Maybe the jumper never develops. Maybe NBA defenses expose limitations in his isolation game. Those are legitimate questions. But if the shooting becomes reliable, the footwork translates and his passing continues to develop, Chicago may have drafted something considerably more interesting than another athletic young forward.

They may have drafted a four who can create an advantage in a part of the court that modern NBA defenses don't spend nearly as much time preparing for.

In a league obsessed with perimeter isolation, that could become a very different kind of weapon for the Bulls — and one that could make Caleb Wilson far more difficult to scheme against than his draft profile initially suggests.

https://youtu.be/Vcej-w9L_sE?si=BCOlRCs2q6sDyB-R