The Athletic just dropped a massive update on the WNBA’s CBA negotiations, and fans are already split on what the league is trying to push through.

Here’s the big picture: The WNBA is offering huge salary jumps — projected seven-figure max deals, average compensation over $500K, and a revenue-based pay system instead of fixed salaries. But according to the report, players would still receive less than 15% of total league revenue, and that percentage is expected to decline over time.

At the same time, the league wants major structural changes: • Mandatory draft combine with harsh penalties (rookies lose half their salary if they skip without an excused absence). • Keeping the core designation and even limiting guaranteed contracts, while the players want both gone. • Removing team housing and car benefits entirely. • Potentially moving training camps to mid-March, causing conflicts with overseas leagues. • Minimal progress on parental leave, mental health reimbursement, and facility standards.

WNBPA president Nneka Ogwumike summed up the tension: the players “don’t feel valued” and don’t believe the league is listening — even as top-line salaries rise.

All of this comes while expansion is looming, revenue is growing, and the CBA deadline has already been extended once. And according to The Athletic, “significant gaps” remain in the core of these negotiations.

QUESTION FOR THE COMMUNITY: Do you think the league’s proposal is a meaningful step forward because compensation is finally increasing? Or is it a step backward because revenue share is shrinking, benefits are being cut, and control mechanisms are tightening?

Which side makes the stronger case — and what would you prioritize if you were negotiating this deal?

Drop your thoughts. Debate it out.