ces921@Round profile imagefeatured creator badge

Craig Shapiro

Partnerces921@Round
Copied to clipboard
Macro Strategist: Ninja Trader Live, Cross-Asset Trader 20+ years, Ex-SAC, Ospraie, Graticule and Circle Lane Capital
Posts
1Followers
5Following

Gold as discipline enforcer

Gold has acted as a discipline enforcer on profligate government spending for generations. Once the gold standard era was ended in 1971, it needed to be replaced by some other enforcement mechanism to deal with inflation and government deficits. This was supposed to be done by central bankers raising rates to fight inflation and by allowing bond vigilantes to use market pricing to help force governments to change their tax and spending habits. If/when that didn't work, the country's fiat currency would get destroyed and the nation would often require some sort of bailout by the IMF. Rinse and repeat, no big deal as long as the emerging market countries said they would try harder next time and as long as they stayed within the US$ backed system.  The problem we have today is that most central bankers, particularly the US Federal Reserve, do not act in ways that enforce any discipline on government spending. And then they don't allow bond vigilantes to do their work to instill that discipline either because it threatens "smooth market functioning" of sovereign bond markets. So it's the worst of both worlds from that perspective.  Government deficits are blowing out, especially in the US, where there is no hope to figure out proper tax and spend policy to reign it in. But the Fed enables this dysfunctional behavior to continue in DC and has allowed the US government to abuse it's exorbitant privilege for far too long. But the chickens seem like they are finally starting to come home to roost as the rest of the world is taking notice, setting up an alternative system and moving away from financing US debt. Foreigners haven’t bought USTs on net since 2014, instead purchasing gold as a neutral reserve asset. I was recently reminded by that Volcker himself was eventually supportive of the US taking itself off the gold standard in 1971. But as Fed chair, Volcker at least acted in a way that put some discipline into the government and economy by raising rates as aggressively as he did to help slay inflation. If more acted like him, particularly the Fed, perhaps Gold wouldn't be needed. But they don't. So it is. And it's breaking out to all time highs. Immanuel Kant said, "Man must be disciplined, for he is by nature raw and wild." Central bankers are men. They need discipline. Gold is being re-inserted back into a multipolar currency world to provide it.
Aug 25, 2024
Roundtable
Roundtable
Roundtable

Was Yesterday the Fed's Trichet Moment?

Hypothesis: Yesterday may have been the Fed's Trichet Moment. Signaling a higher for longer outlook as the economy has begun to roll over means we are assured of a harder landing. Enter the narrative "The Fed is Behind The Curve." Bad setup for small cap equities. We are finally at the point where the long and variable impacts of monetary policy tightening are hurting a large enough portion of the economy to overwhelm the benefits that we have seen so far from higher rates that have been afforded to the wealthy asset holders, homeowners with locked in low rate mortgages and corporates that were able to borrow cheaply during Covid. However, this transition to a growth slowdown has just begun and since inflation is still well above target, while the unemployment rate is still quite low by any historical understanding of maximum employment, the Fed will to be slower to react to the growth slowdown, which actually will increase the likelihood that the slowdown will become worse than expected as we move into next year. The Fed needs to wait longer before acting in order to be sure that inflation has been slayed. However, their asymmetric policy stance, where the bar to cut is lower than the bar to hike, has created extraordinarily loose financial conditions which continues to bid up asset prices, and thru the wealth channel, makes achievement of 2% inflation that much more difficult. The market has already front run the Fed's reaction function and this complicates the Fed's ability to deliver on easing. Since the Fed has basically neutered QT as a tool to help with asset prices by starting their tapering of QT, the only real tool they have left is the Dot plot. They need to show the market that their reaction function is slower and will be less accommodative than folks believe. The only way to do this is to remove cuts from their outlook, both for this year, and importantly for 2025 . They did this yesterday by moving in a hawkish direction despite lower than expected May inflation data. They took up their forecast for core PCE for 2024 as well. They also moved the LT neutral rate higher. So the Fed is shifting in a hawkish direction as the data is shifting the wrong way. With nominal GDP growth momentum finally decelerating, it will be hard to generate earnings growth momentum to support stock prices. With the Fed slow to deliver accommodation until unexpected weakness in the labor market shows up, it will be hard to get further multiple expansion from on an already overvalued stock market. The strike price on the Fed's "put" to act is lower than here. My favored portfolio expression in short small cap equities and long gold on the above thesis.
Jun 13, 2024
Roundtable

My thoughts on the trading week ahead: 5/6-5/10

As we look ahead to this week's trading, although there isn't a ton of US macro data on the calendar, we are reminded that Janet has a lot of paper to sell this week. $125bn combined of 3y ($58bn), 10y ($42bn) and 30y ($25bn). Treasury generally sells these three issues in the same week and this $125bn combined compares to $121bn in February, $112bn in November and $90bn in August (the first months post QRA are always the highest for the next three month period). Number go up! Given the Apple buyback news, we should also get a pretty sizable bond offering from them next week which will add to the fixed income supply coming down the pipeline. The economic data we got this past week for the most part showed an economy that is starting to slow but has very sticky inflation pressures. This is going to make it harder for the Fed to provide accommodation any time soon as they need to keep rates higher for longer to bring inflation down. Although Powell sounded dovish at the press conference and did deliver QT tapering beginning in June, I don't believe that he spoke for the entirety of the Fed last week. We have already heard from Bowman who once again cemented her position as the most hawkish Governor on the FOMC, as she suggested that rate hikes are still on the table as there remain upside risks to inflation. She commented: "While the current stance of monetary policy appears to be at a restrictive level, I remain willing to raise the federal funds rate at a future meeting should the incoming data indicate that progress on inflation has stalled or reversed." Even Goolsbee, considered amongst the most dovish members, wouldn't admit that rate hikes weren't discussed at the meeting when he was pressed about it in an interview. We will hear from various other Fed members this week including hawks like Barkin (voter), Kashkari (non-voter) and Logan (non-voter) as well as more dovish members like Jefferson (voter), Williams (voter), Collins (non-voter), Cook (voter) and Daly (voter). Fed nerds like me will be listening closely to get a sense of what triggers members are looking at from the data to suggest whether or not they think risks to their next move should be more dual sided between a cut and a hike in order to bring inflation back down to target. Clearly there was some talk of rate hikes at this most recent meeting which means that it will be harder for Powell to kick off an easing cycle later this year unless we have a drastic slowdown in the labor market, something that is yet to be observed. I still contend that Powell needs unanimous consent before starting this rate cutting cycle in an election year as he has been the consensus building Fed chair for years and has only had one dissenting vote since Covid. A rate cut decision with dissenting votes would be seen as highly political and I think this would tarnish his reputation as well as the Fed's credibility (assuming that is something they still care about). The Fed has put itself in a box here. They are afraid to raise rates and put more pressure on the economy but also can't really cut rates because it will further awaken animal spirits and inflation expectations. They can't use their balance sheet as a tool to drain liquidity more aggressively because they want it to operate in the background like watching paint dry (and beginning the tapering of QT next month adds liquidity on the margin which is ridiculous but don't get me started on that). As for Treasury, we learned last week that tax receipts are coming in lighter than expected while spending growth continues to accelerate, so the need for duration issuance is going to be with us for a while and remains difficult for folks to front-run given the size. The strike price for Yellen to provide liquidity relief to the markets aside from her token buyback operations is at a lower level in risk asset prices from here. With inflation pressures still elevated and more duration supply coming, it will be very interesting to see how the bond market handles the new issues. I suspect we are going to continue to see rising yields, rising term premiums and higher compensation needed for the private sector to take down this capacity, which should keep pressure on risk assets over the next week. I am short small caps as my preferred vehicle to capture what I think will be pressured risk markets in the weeks to come.
May 5, 2024
Roundtable