Despite claims of a "best of worlds" structure, the decision to lock up 85% of shares, leaving only 2 million out of 13.5 million total for public trading, is explicitly about "restricting supply." This extreme scarcity, coupled with a $150M valuation from a small insider investment, raises serious questions about genuine liquidity and long-term value for public shareholders. Is this truly a "best of worlds" for *all* investors, or a strategic maneuver to control the market?
This summary was generated by AI
3