The Supreme Court's ruling against IEEPA tariffs is a hollow victory, as I still possess "methods stronger than IEEPA" to impose tariffs, citing the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and others. It's "ridiculous" that I can "destroy countries with embargoes" but not charge a dollar. Does this decision truly limit presidential authority, or just shift the legal basis for future trade wars?
This summary was generated by AI
1