Powered by Roundtable
CryptoGlyn@bbs profile image
CryptoGlyn
Nov 19, 2023

Happy Sunday once again all😍. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵  is the following 'latest' available graph to 17th  November, inclusive of 8 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 18th November UTC close. 👍      

From 0xreclamation: 06:40 UTC 19/11/23. Latest graph available.From 0xreclamation: 06:40 UTC 19/11/23. Latest graph available.

Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:

From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.

**No post last Sunday so week on week change is for 2 weeks.

*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*

As a weekly short summary and observation:

7 out of 8 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:

Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for 3 months+ being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔    

As to GAMTECH, MWATALK, MNFTC, SATIVA all continue to fail EM criteria on one or both counts for months now. As of now, the criteria is unchanged.  

Further notes:

Well, still dragging along the bottom and all 8 EM boards are suffering from low interaction too, as noted by post count and commenters per board (See Rewards Table), which is most reflective in the DMAUV counts with 6 out of 8 boards indeed quite low. "Unique members" count is also very low at 425 UTC close 18th and only 3 above the all time low (of 422) 28 days ago; this too does not help DAM with 7 out of 8 boards failing the benchmark.😳

Of note also, these moving average posts are not scheduled weekly anymore for now. They will be published as and when the community manager sees a need for one.👍

Maybe we have reached the bottom and maybe some better news will arrive very soon😎. Once it does, then I hope there is a development shakeup, more proactive BBS team involvement, a possible EM criteria review, and indeed a notification of Engagement Mining Transition 8 (which is a month overdue already).🙄

If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏

Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 

9