RTB Token & NetworkSo one week along after a large pump up to 2.5 cents dead twice on MEXC which equated to a 67% rise in price. As is oft the case a retrace is seen and that retrace came back to bubbling around the 2 cent line for a few days....
.... but after some fierce swings, some very strange sudden buy walls🤔, along came a 'dormant address of 2+ years' shifted 1,000,000 tokens and subsequently dumped in a few hours couple of days ago😢. That spoiled the party and as can be seen dropped way below the 2 cent line that was 'sort of' holding. Yesterday a low of $0.015301 and thus a mere 2.2% increase on the pump start point of $0.014969 and also equates to a 97% retrace from hi of pump price. So 'Nearly' when I say Pump and Dump as it didn't quite make the 100% ...but yep it's a Pump and Dump nonetheless eh.👍
Today the price has hit a low of $0.016044 just an hour or so ago, but a few small buys saw it stop out at $0.016896 exactly a week later equating to a 12.9% rise in price over the week.
With inflows into MEXC rising by some 3.2 million BBS net in the past week (Some 40% increase in supply on exchange) then there could be more selling from here ....who knows? Only the big boys know, why, and what the real plan is eh.😎
DYOR, find your own conclusions, and happy trading all.
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆Mar 29, 2024 RTB Token & Network RTB Token & Network Happy New Year all and off we go into 2024😍 As a final roundup of my BBS stats, I had to complete Q4 after making Q3 and other monthly reports (Copied and attached in this post) for the latter half of 2023. So, here we go if you are interested:
So, and very briefly this time, it's finally looking a bit more that we have hit the bottom and pulling slightly out of it on BBS given the final column December figures (not overall Q4 figures to be noted). SATIVA has pulled up well but IMO only due to turning the tipping tap on in late November encouraging more regular posters to come back and start posting ...one could say that is their motivation. MWATALK also doing well but I feel that it is because it's a better run board than its competitor MNFTC which as can be seen is still struggling. However, the 'Unique Members' count on 30th December was an all time low at 386 indicating there is not much interest in BBS presently.
Here's some old data charts if you wish to use for comparison covering the latter half of 2023:
FYI for members, please read:
So, I think that will probably be my last roundup on stats as there isn't much interest from above or below. The "Weekly DMAUV" too cannot be published now, especially since the community manager has left and thus no graph is forwarded to me by him nor any other dev team member as they all appear to be absent also. Furthermore, this was important for members to view as we had Engagement Mining transitions, but those too have ceased for now and no idea when the next will be, thus also no point in getting into 'EM criteria' with this post as no 'transitions'. No new applications have been forwarded as no one has tried that hard to get a new board off the ground. Shame we are losing that gift of transparency lately too eh.
Left in the dark as Meta mods and unpaid too for oh so long now, the team has come to a halt and no activity is going on in our moderation group since 20th December. Please note that any 'Bugs' or 'Suggestions' posts will not be forwarded to the dev team from the moderation group as we have lost our community manager as the bridge between the mods and the dev team. However, still make them and hopefully 'someone' will take note.
I wish you all well for 2024 and I also hope that BBS can still lift off, but as many, the hopium is waning. I'm still around all but I'll be less active too as I'm sure many of you here could understand.
💖All the best, over and out....
Cheers, CryptoGlyn 🦆Jan 1, 2024 RTB Token & Network RTB Token & Network As a historic reference of "Daily Active Members" (DAM) for November 2023 that can be referred back to, it is one of the key quantitative factors in the Engagement Mining Program. Again, a sliding month as can be seen😥:
DAM roundups😎
The only gainer this month has been the admin board METABBS itself and SPORTX seems to have found its bottom with a very small percentage drop. Comparing with the previous month (Published November 1st):
INDFAM has taken the largest hit dropping from top spot to last spot from some growth in October to a 30.5% drop in November. MNFTC is still doing poorly being in 7th and 8th spots respectively for 2 months. However, most boards have continued to drop at around 11 to 14.2% but slightly slower than October which can be hopefully taken as a positive sign that "The bottom" has been reached on BBS for EM approved boards.It must be remembered that DAM criteria is a minimum of 35 for EM approval still (Maybe will be updated?) thus all 7 boards bar METABBS are continuing month on month to fail this basic quantitative criteria.
BBS Token😍
Well, and for a refreshing change, it seems BBS token for the first time since February has broken the positive correlation with DAM and 'Unique Member figures'.👍
The previous month saw a slide to as low as $0.005115 on MEXC and an average of $0.0055 to $0.0060 which ran from around 25th Oct to 3rd Nov. Then there was a nice pump up into the region of $0.0070 to $0.0077 which was sustained until just a couple of days ago with another fresh and larger pump going as high as $0.015 on MEXC but now as we start December settling in at just under $0.01 (CMC data: UTC 07:52 $0.009425). Given the overall average change it's roughly an 80% increase for November and good to see after many months printing a negative.
Why the pumps? I think most of it lies on the possible news of an investor deal that has been written about of late, but right now it is still not publicly announced. Indeed the 2nd and larger pump just 2 days ago 'could' indicate that the long awaited deal has already been signed, yet we are still all in the dark as to "Yes or No" ...lol, I'll use that word that I've worn out lately "SOON" ; maybe soon we hear some news🙄 If the deal is a no then expect the price to drop IMO and lol 'soon'. 🤪
As a quick side note too: Engagement Mining Transition 8 is now about 6 weeks overdue. Once more involvement and meaningful development takes place then I'm sure a date will be announced. As of now, I see no new boards that could even contemplate putting in an EM application given the current quantitative criteria, thus there would only be more probation notices or removals of boards.
Keep well all and let's hope for "Good News Soon"🤪 and an even happier spot price too.😍
Cheers, CryptoGlyn. 🦆Dec 1, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday once again all😍. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 17th November, inclusive of 8 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 18th November UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
**No post last Sunday so week on week change is for 2 weeks.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 out of 8 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for 3 months+ being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
As to GAMTECH, MWATALK, MNFTC, SATIVA all continue to fail EM criteria on one or both counts for months now. As of now, the criteria is unchanged.
Further notes:
Well, still dragging along the bottom and all 8 EM boards are suffering from low interaction too, as noted by post count and commenters per board (See Rewards Table), which is most reflective in the DMAUV counts with 6 out of 8 boards indeed quite low. "Unique members" count is also very low at 425 UTC close 18th and only 3 above the all time low (of 422) 28 days ago; this too does not help DAM with 7 out of 8 boards failing the benchmark.😳
Of note also, these moving average posts are not scheduled weekly anymore for now. They will be published as and when the community manager sees a need for one.👍Maybe we have reached the bottom and maybe some better news will arrive very soon😎. Once it does, then I hope there is a development shakeup, more proactive BBS team involvement, a possible EM criteria review, and indeed a notification of Engagement Mining Transition 8 (which is a month overdue already).🙄
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Nov 19, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday all😍. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 3rd November, inclusive of 8 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 4th November UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 out of 8 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH lost it's DMAUV this week for the first time whilst MWATALK after last week too has improved and gained it back to 'green'. SATIVA continues to fail badly all for 2 months + now, and MNFTC is struggling to find minimum DMAUV for the past 4 weeks. 😥
Further notes:
DAM on all 8 EM boards went down this week but only by small margins on all and circa '-1' for each board. Not much change too in DMAUV and with just 432 'Unique Members' for Saturday UTC close (ATL 422 2 weeks ago) then it seems the bottom has been found and again dragging along it. When will it improve? When there is some input from above IMO.🤪
No more news to report this week and nothing forwarded ...sooo, nothing to really add all. Engagement Mining Transition 8 delayed and who knows when that will be.🙄
😍Happy "Bonfire Night" to those in the UK😍
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Nov 5, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy November all😍 and a short statistical post with some opinion and status added. As many of you know, and for transparency, I produce a weekly post on a Sunday for quantitative criteria of the Engagement Mining Program. These monthly and quarterly posts are added for a statistical reference which can be used in the future to gauge how BBS has performed and is performing.
DAM roundups.
Yes, it's been a sad month to be honest, and more downside has occurred on all fronts, BBS. Market and BBS token too (I still feel they are reflective of one another). So here is a BBS roundup of October, along with Q3 and September which was published in a post October 1st by myself and table reproduced here for reference... For original discussion (Q3 Roundup of DAM) click the link:
DAM is a major factor in the quantitative criteria for EM and also that of the actual rewards in dollars received daily by the 8 boards above. The picture isn't a pretty one and self evident viewing the table. Remember: A minimum of DAM 35 is the current benchmark, thus 7 out of the 8 boards are failing this (Only METABBS as the admin board for BBS is above at 55). Only one board has actually had a positive month being INDFAM and has built further on positive momentum as it did in September too, but then only after a drastic dive for early Q3 (see below).
Included here if you wish to compare with Q3 or indeed September on the far right of the table. As you can see AITAH and PROCHOC are no longer on the October table as they were both removed from the EM program on October 23rd due to inactivity from October 1st on (On those boards a notice was placed "On vacation" and no new posts approved, thus an odd one shutting their own doors on EM $$$ and finally removed once a dev team member hit the button) . Comparing month on month, the decline in October is slightly worse overall than that of September percent-wise. Have we now reached a bottom or is BBS just going to die/is dead as many are saying lately? Let's see how November unfolds.
BBS token
Well, October awful and the screenshot of the CMC graph below says all. Fast approaching half a cent as an average it's not pretty and no real buyers out there as IMO there is a current lack of confidence in the project and thus this is also reflected in the current spot price.
The spot over just October has fallen from $0.0075 to $0.0055, a 26.6% reduction. 2 days ago I witnessed an all time low on MEXC exchange of $0.005115 too. Still above half a cent and maybe that's it, but given the downside momentum for several months then it has a good chance of breaking that too.
BBS status.
October has been a very difficult month given communication between the dev team and MetaBBS admin inclusive of the Community Manager has been lacking. Since before the ongoing conflict in Israel and throughout it too, very little information has come forth. What I do know is that the investors coming on board is still in progress and recently online meetings were held with Eyal and the team ...the outcome and how quick the progress will be with this is still privy information. We as a moderation team are still here and it is frustrating that we can't furnish members with good concrete answers to queries but we will do what we can in the interim. The Community manager is still hopeful and has assured me that the investor plans are still moving forward but yep it's slow. Furthermore, Engagement Mining Transition 8 which should have been concluded on October 18th is on indefinite hold. Until communication opens up from the dev team then it could literally be 'any time'.
Part on my work here on METABBS is to offer quantitative data thus the first part of the post is a little more for historic reference. Please feel free to use these and any other tables I have produced in your own analysis. It's a shame BBS is the way it is and I see many long-term believers in this project losing their belief. It's a shame for all those that have staked their BBS token too as IMO it would have been better to sell ongoing as earnt than stake and hold ...however, you never know still 'if' we can climb out of this pit. It's become a grim situation of how us as ordinary members can attract more and make BBS grow and I feel there are next to no answers to this; much has been tried already and ideas exhausted. The dev team needs to come back but now the war has diverted their attention which I can understand, yet even in these times "The show must go on" and leaving us all to our own devices here without direction may implode BBS for good. Is BBS dead many say and I can understand that sentiment also. I wonder too 'if' the 'investor/s' are reading any of these posts on METABBS and 'if' so what must they think?
I'll keep plugging all and I will try my best to keep bringing you statistical data and analysis weekly and monthly and hope you find it useful in your arguments thereto. Until we are officially "Dead" then I will keep making the weekly moving average posts too as IMO it is what BBS should also be about "Transparency"....I wish though that we had a bit more input from above to help us in this too.
Keep well all out there and stay safe too🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn🦆Nov 1, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday all😍. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 27th October, inclusive of 8 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 28th October UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 out of 8 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH still failing DAM but consistently passing DMAUV for 2+ months, MWATALK the same too until this week also failing DMAUV. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 2+ months. MNFTC for 2+ months is failing one or both criteria.😥
On other notes:
As you've probably noticed AITAH and PROCHOC have been removed from the graph and table as also removed from the EM program as of 23rd October UTC close. Their figures on all 3 criteria are drastically failing given their doors are shut for 4 weeks and thus no point in showing them here anymore. It is a Removal and unsure 'if' they will be back.
Even though now the DAU column is empty as to the above removals, it is still shown as it is part of the current criteria. No board is anywhere near 300 and thus not shown. If you wish to view yourself then go to the Rewards Table.👍
Another low number week but GAMTECH has held up well with the same DMAUV and the only board to gain in DAM. A slight overall improvement in DMAUV with only 2 boards down. Not a great week and it seems we are dragging along the bottom for now.😎
Engagement Mining Transition 8 is still 'on hold' and no idea when it will be.🤔 All is pretty much on hold for now as the problems continue in Israel and Gaza + West Bank and we will all just have to be patient I guess.
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Oct 29, 2023 RTB Token & Network Well, a month ago on 23rd September, BBS token broke 8/10ths of a cent on the main exchanges listed on CoinMarketCap ...for the last few days we are fairly consistently below 6/10ths of a cent😥
Unless you've been living under a rock, Bitcoin has taken off touching $35K+ and many alt coins have rallied too. BBS did have a small upturn in the peak of this rally of Bitcoin but today has dropped once again to sub $0.006 levels and thus has not followed suit. Given too that BBS is stalling at the mo' with the development team mainly based in Israel and most matters 'On Hold', then BBS could be seen in crisis for the short-term. Wei Ji 危机 as a Chinese philosophy is the notion that many follow in business being "Opportunity in Crisis".
Is this an opportunity we have right here right now to capitalise on this crisis? Or is it just another step in a larger fall in BBS spot price? It all boils down to your own personal confidence and the risk tolerance you allow yourself. However, taking a look at the main exchange for BBS exchange being MEXC, here's the last few days:
As you can see for about 4 days, the price has been below $0.006 and the bulk of 'real' trading (humans not bots) has been done at $0.0055 over this period (I follow hourly and daily thus have seen this). Yes, a quick rally up yesterday along with the Bitcoin boom but alas not sustained. Yes, BBS did also ping $0.005392 3 days ago and was an All Time Low for MEXC but the sells below $0.0055 equated to less than $100 (I know I was buying with set orders to that ATL). The price you see in the CMC screenshot has an ATL of $0.005798 but that was derived mainly from Pancake Swap data.
Wei Ji 危机 and yes there could well be an opportunity in crisis here between the two white lines of $0.0060 and $0.0055 as heartless as it sounds, but in business and finance 'The show must go on'. 🙏
What's your take? Are you buying, selling, holding, or doing nothing? Happy trading and DYOR etc.
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆Oct 25, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday once again😍 and back on track🙏. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 20th October, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 21st October UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Please note, last DMAUV post was late thus week on week direction change is for 3 days only👍
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
9 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH and MWATALK have failed DAM for about 2 months, but both boards pass DMAUV weekly and have done so all the time. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 2 months. MNFTC for 2+ months is failing one or both criteria.😥
AITAH and PROCHOC have taken a massive dive these last 21 days due to a notice placed on both boards as to "On vacation" until further notice (October 1st), thus no new posts approved🤔. Visits and views are drastically cut and now both boards are totally failing DMAUV which is a necessity "in all instances" according to the current criteria.😲 The original qualification using DAU is near to failing too and will possibly be under 300 within a couple of days on both boards.
On other notes:
Well, only 3 days since the last post but it does look like we are near the bottom of the bottom🤪. A new all time low for 'Unique Members' was also printed for Saturday 21st at 422 ...let's hope this is it and a climb from here🙏. Still 9 boards going down on DAM and INDFAM a shade up, but DMAUV is looking a little better overall👍.
As to the situation with PROCHOC and AITAH: Their numbers have fallen through the floor due to inactivity for 3 weeks today. Some action has been suggested and the community manager has forwarded his recommendations to the development team. However, given the situation in Israel currently, the development team is predisposed and most if not all is on hold.
Please bear with us all and continue to benefit from the EM $$$ still flowing for now👍. There are no new approvals to be considered in the next Engagement Mining Transition (as no EM applications in), thus as of today all 10 boards continue within the EM program. IMO, the delay in EM T8 is not the worse thing to happen right now; there would only be bad news to be delivered to boards if it were to take place given the current quantitative criteria, which whilst may be reviewed in the future, this still determines the status quo.🙏
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Oct 22, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday! Oh no, it's Thursday! and a bit late lol ... but better late than never eh🤪. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 17th October, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 18th October UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Please note table and graph are 4 days later than usual thus week on week direction changes are for 11 days this time.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
9 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH has consistently failed DAM for the last 11 weeks and MWATALK for 7 weeks too, but both boards pass DMAUV weekly and have done so all the time. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 7 weeks. MNFTC for 9 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥
AITAH and PROCHOC have taken a massive dive these last 18 days due to a notice placed on both boards as to "On vacation" until further notice (October 1st), thus no new posts approved🤔. Visits and views are drastically cut and now both boards are totally failing DMAUV which is a necessity "in all instances" according to the current criteria.😲 (Some action may be forthcoming!)
On other notes:
Well, it's just not looking pretty is it🙄 Sorry for the lateness of this Moving Average post but I think the community manager was down the pub on Sunday🍺🍺🍺😂😍.
Engagement Mining Transition 8 ain't happening yet and is "On Hold", but then there are no new boards to be approved and thus all that would be considered are removals & probation, so for the respective boards owners be happy the 💲💲💲 are still flowing👍 Hang in there🙏
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Oct 19, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday once again😍 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 6th October, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 7th October UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
9 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH has consistently failed DAM for the last 10 weeks and MWATALK for 6 weeks too, but both boards pass DMAUV weekly and have done so all the time. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 6 weeks. MNFTC for 8 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥
AITAH and PROCHOC have taken a massive dive this last week due to a notice placed on both boards as to "On vacation" until further notice (October 1st), thus no new posts approved🤔. Visits and views are drastically cut and now both boards are failing DMAUV which is a necessity "in all instances" according to the current criteria.😲
On other notes:
Well, the most shocking week yet across BBS with only one board meeting quantitative criteria being the admin board here METABBS. DAM week on week down on 9 out of the 10 boards and DMAUV overall unimpressive and noted visually by the downslopes in the graph. Moreover, for UTC Saturday close, just 487 Unique members which is as low as I've seen. With EM T8 'probably soon' then there will be even more tough decisions to be made as to the fate of some boards with now 9 under consideration quantitatively.😵
Engagement Mining Transition 8 has a tentative date, Wednesday 18th October 2023. Not fully confirmed, but once it is I'll inform you all here and in the live chat.👍
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Oct 8, 2023 RTB Token & Network Well, it's been quite a quarter for the 10 now EM approved boards😲. Just 2 weeks before Q3 started Engagement Mining Transition 6 took place and was quite a shake up with a board removed and none approved from the 4 applications. This has had a knock-on effect as many members were also removed for fraud. What is witnessed is a general slide in activity and presented here is a major factor in the rewards formula and 'growth' that of DAM (Daily Active Members).
Ranked 'Best to Worst' over the 92 days of Q3 along with percentage changes. Also September 30 days and the close is obviously the same as Q3 close, and has been placed in the table for further discussion and comparison. DAM figures are '28 day average' recorded data points.
Q3 brief sum:
For Q3 only the 2 newer EM approved boards of AITAH and PROCHOC have increased. On top of DAM improvement they also account for around 85% of all visits to BBS through the large numbers seen daily in DAU (Daily Active Users).
THEORY, a probationary board from before EM T7 has held on well only losing 10.6% over Q3.
GAMTECH, MWATALK, and SPORTX have all seen drops over Q3 between 20 and 30% which given the reduction in 'Unique Members' visiting BBS daily is generally reflective of overall activity.
METABBS has become quieter throughout Q3 and lost 45.2%. Given this is the most single visited board by 'Unique Members' due to its nature as the admin board for BBS, then it is quite worrying where BBS is heading. As said 20-30% is reflective, 45% is a bit heavy.
MNFTC, INDFAM, and SATIVA are all in the high loss bracket of 60 to 70%. This is not reflective of the general downturn in 'Unique Member' numbers and more is at play with these three boards.
September brief sum:
I added this last month to view if some boards have in essence "Found the bottom" or have slowed to a point that it looks that way. The only board that has had significant growth over September is PROCHOC at 29.2%
However, MNFTC, GAMTECH, THEORY, AITAH, and INDFAM (-4.7% to +5.7% respectively) have arguably found the bottom and thus improvement from here on in? Indeed all these board's rate of descent has slowed relatively to the overall performance seen throughout Q3, and can be seen as a positive sign for the near future.
METABBS, SPORTX, and MWATALK ( -11.8% to -16% respectively) are still dropping, but again reflective of the overall 'Unique Member' numbers of late.
SATIVA at -27.7%, and the worse performer for Q3 overall too is losing it's member base far over the average of general Q3 and September decline. Again there is more to this than just the 'Unique member' drop.
Closing thoughts:
Whilst I thought about giving my opinions about each board (Which I do have, and it would make the post long-winded) I thought is was best not to and just leave this here as mostly a statistical record for September and Q3. DAM as said is a major factor on BBS but I do look forward to another Lee analysis post, as from her wider analysis paints an even more accurate picture.👍
All I wish to add here as observation is the numbers are down due to many removed for fraud, less $$$ on the table and as we all know many were/are here just for that, and as a consequence of these dwindling numbers dissent has taken root. Many unhappy members, moderators, and board owners as you can see from posts and comments which has led to a demotivational cloud for many. Where do we go from here? Up I hope.🙏
If you wish to comment please do, but please do not get personal about it. Yes, you can mention a board but be respectful and thoughtful with your comment/s. If not, it will be hidden by a moderator.
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆Oct 1, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Saturday all😲😍 Usually every Sunday, but I have another DAM statistical post for tomorrow rounding up Q3 and little time to make two posts tomorrow with live data🙏 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 28th September, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 29th September UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH for over a month is failing on DAM. MWATALK for over a month also failing DAM. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 5 weeks. MNFTC for 7 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥
On other notes:
From last week where there was a mixture of DMAUV and DAM up and down as indicated by the arrows, this week is an overall short fall south, especially on DMAUV with 8 boards dropping and 2 sideways, due to less 'Unique members' (Super low for 29th close at 554UM) and general interaction thereto. Moreover, 4 boards are failing both criteria this week too and up one from last week😥. Not the prettiest of pictures this week but things are afoot and hope for some good news 'soon' as we get into Q4😎
Engagement Mining Transition 8 has a tentative date, Wednesday 18th October 2023. Not fully confirmed, but once it is I'll inform you all here and in the live chat.👍
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Sep 30, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday all 😍 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵 is the following 'latest' available graph to 22nd September, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 23rd September UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
Also a new addition in the table which I hope members like: Weekly change to values indicated by pointers 'red' down, 'green' up, 'grey' no change. As a basic visual as to the 7-day change from the previous week to this week now.👍
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. I would 'assume' this probation could continue to Transition 8.🤔
GAMTECH for over a month is failing on DAM. MWATALK for the last 4 weeks also failing DAM. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 4 weeks. MNFTC for 6 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥
On other notes:
Engagement Mining Transition 8 has a tentative date, Wednesday 18th October 2023. Not fully confirmed, but once it is I'll inform you all here.👍
As we can see in the table, both AITAH and recently PROCHOC are now also in the 'green' on DAM too; both these boards are still growing in effect.👍
With all 7 boards failing DAM still and 3 this week failing DMAUV the picture isn't a pretty one. But as you can see with the new arrows that whilst DAM is overall down, DMAUV is overall up across the 10 boards. One could surmise overall that not much change has occurred from last week and we are still dragging along the bottom🙄
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Sep 24, 2023 RTB Token & Network Well, BBS token is really suffering at the moment with all 4 exchanges on CoinMarketCap showing less than 0.8 of a cent ! Even Bancor (Same owner as BBS) has seen heightened selling pressure today with a volume of $4100 (usually in the hundreds only) driving the price way down in the last few days.😲
Bancor now the lowest out of the 4 shown at 0.7405 of a cent and the rest not much better.
The whole of September on MEXC has been generally bearish except for some moves made by a block entry of staggered buying at $10K driving the price up to as high as 0.9448 of a cent but came to an end when a single sell order was executed on the 13th for the remaining $5K of block order ...since then the price has fallen off considerably. Of note too, in August two $10K blocks were also executed circa 1.07 and 0.95 of a cent and I'm thinking that all $30K is a single buyer🤔. However, even with this 'buyer' trying to push the price up it has failed and we see where we are now: Down in the doldrums even on MEXC at circa 0.78 of a cent for the last day or so...not pretty😥
Cause and effect of the Bancor price right now, as is the linked cash out value here on BBS. Market.😲
135 to $1 !!! I have never seen it this high. One might say a good time to cash out, but then with all this bearish pressure this week and especially today, will we see half a cent? It's possible and TBH I'm not surprised that the price is diving right now ...BBS members down, numbers down, and still waiting on the hopeful news of the mysterious partnership as Eyal explained in a post a few days ago. Really simple: Confidence is lacking and thus hard to pick up investors right now ...gotta get moving on the news and further development ...sry "The team" but it's all too quiet here which you can see.🙄
All just a heads up for you hodlers and spinners of BBS ..DYOR and make your own decisions.😎
Cheers, CryptoGlyn🦆Sep 23, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy Sunday 😍 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your absolute viewing pleasure🙄 is the following 'latest' available graph to 15th September, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 16th September UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation' but is the outlier on the table being the only board this last week to improve and DMAUV has turned green for only the 2nd time in 2 months plus👍. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. I would 'assume' this probation could continue to Transition 8 around mid-October.🤔
GAMTECH for over a month is failing on DAM. MWATALK for the last 3 weeks also failing DAM. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 3 weeks. MNFTC for 5 weeks and is again failing both criteria for the 2nd time.😥
So, from last week, the picture is slightly poorer, especially on DMAUV with only THEORY going markedly north; Even the 2 newer EM boards AITAH and PROCHOC have seen quite a slide at 6 and 9 points respectively also.... METABBS down 11 and very little activity of late. DAM figures overall have reduced too. With 'Unique Members' generally falling off and many days seeing a sub 600 figure in the Rewards Table (582 today), this is continually becoming more reflective in this Moving Average Sunday roundup. Still waiting on some promising news, but I even wonder then with good news 'if' we start to see improvement in the above table with all 3 EM criteria data.🤔
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Sep 17, 2023 RTB Token & Network Happy later than usual Sunday 😍 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure is the following 'latest' available graph to 8th September, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 9th September UTC close. 👍
Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:
From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.
*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*
As a weekly short summary and observation:
7 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😲:
Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation' and is continuing to fail on both criteria. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. I would 'assume' this probation could continue to Transition 8 around mid-October.👍
GAMTECH for over a month is failing on DAM. MWATALK for the last two weeks also failing DAM. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 2 weeks. MNFTC for the 4th week is failing one or both of the criteria but this week has seen DMAUV back in the 'green' at 23.😥
Not really much change as to last week and the daily 'Unique Member' numbers on the reward table are still often in the low 600's on average. With 4 boards this week still failing on both criteria and in the 'red', no real uptick can be viewed. However, the 2 newer EM boards are progressing on DAM each week with AITAH in the 'green' for 2 weeks now and IMO soon PROCHOC will see 'green' too at 33 DAM today.👍
If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏
Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆 Sep 10, 2023 RTB Token & Network 
