Powered by Roundtable
CryptoGlyn@bbs profile image
CryptoGlyn
Oct 8, 2023

Happy Sunday once again😍 A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵  is the following 'latest' available graph to 6th October, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 7th October UTC close. 👍    

From 0xreclamation: 06:55 UTC 8/10/23. Latest graph available.From 0xreclamation: 06:55 UTC 8/10/23. Latest graph available.

Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:

From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.

*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*

As a weekly short summary and observation:

boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:

Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔   

GAMTECH has consistently failed DAM for the last 10 weeks and MWATALK for 6 weeks too, but both boards pass DMAUV weekly and have done so all the time. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 6 weeks. MNFTC for 8 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥   

AITAH and PROCHOC have taken a massive dive this last week due to a notice placed on both boards as to "On vacation" until further notice (October 1st), thus no new posts approved🤔. Visits and views are drastically cut and now both boards are failing DMAUV which is a necessity "in all instances" according to the current criteria.😲

On other notes:

Well, the most shocking week yet across BBS with only one board meeting quantitative criteria being the admin board here METABBS. DAM week on week down on 9 out of the 10 boards and DMAUV overall unimpressive and noted visually by the downslopes in the graph. Moreover, for UTC Saturday close, just 487 Unique members which is as low as I've seen. With EM T8 'probably soon' then there will be even more tough decisions to be made as to the fate of some boards with now 9 under consideration quantitatively.😵

Engagement Mining Transition 8 has a tentative date, Wednesday 18th October 2023. Not fully confirmed, but once it is I'll inform you all here and in the live chat.👍   

If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏

Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆  

18