Happy Sunday! Oh no, it's Thursday! and a bit late lol ... but better late than never eh🤪. A view of the DMAUV (Daily moving average of unique viewers). For your viewing pleasure😵  is the following 'latest' available graph to 17th October, inclusive of 10 boards, followed by a breakdown in a table including the latest DAM and DAU values drawn from the "Rewards Table" as of 18th October UTC close. 👍      

Here's a table compiled offering three sets of data with benchmarks of quantitative data for the Engagement mining program:

From Rewards Table data DAM (Daily Active Members (DAM) refers to the number of unique members (registered users) who have engaged with the app on a given day) and the lower figure of the two is used as is the '28 day average' for 'current' EM criteria. Furthermore, "28-day average of 300+ Daily Active Users shown (DAU)" and the lower figure of the two is used.

*Please note table and graph are 4 days later than usual thus week on week direction changes are for 11 days this time.

*Current EM criteria: DMAUV 20+ in all instances, along with DAM 35+ and/or DAU 300+*

As a weekly short summary and observation:

9 boards in the table fail to meet this weeks criteria😵:

Probationary boards (3): As noted in Engagement Mining Transition 7, THEORY is continuing 'Probation'. Two further boards were added as failing criteria for several weeks being INDFAM and SPORTX which are also still failing both criteria consistently. This 'probation' will be sorted out on Transition 8.🤔    

GAMTECH has consistently failed DAM for the last 11 weeks and MWATALK for 7 weeks too, but both boards pass DMAUV weekly and have done so all the time. SATIVA is now also failing both criteria for the last 7 weeks. MNFTC for 9 weeks failing one or both criteria.😥  

AITAH and PROCHOC have taken a massive dive these last 18 days due to a notice placed on both boards as to "On vacation" until further notice (October 1st), thus no new posts approved🤔. Visits and views are drastically cut and now both boards are totally failing DMAUV which is a necessity "in all instances" according to the current criteria.😲 (Some action may be forthcoming!)  

On other notes:

Well, it's just not looking pretty is it🙄 Sorry for the lateness of this Moving Average post but I think the community manager was down the pub on Sunday🍺🍺🍺😂😍.

Engagement Mining Transition 8 ain't happening yet and is "On Hold", but then there are no new boards to be approved and thus all that would be considered are removals & probation, so for the respective boards owners be happy the 💲💲💲 are still flowing👍 Hang in there🙏

If you have any questions or suggestions then please feel free to comment below. If you see any errors in the table then please tell me tyvm and I will update. If you have queries about any board that is not shown in the graph and table then please ask, but please also be patient as I do not have access to DMAUV myself for security reasons and thus I will forward your query to the dev team and respond when I can. Finally, please try to stay on topic in the comments that it is relevant to this 'quantitative' data and the EM program. This post is not for 'qualitative' and 'fraud' arguments. If comments are deemed to be this, then they will be hidden without notice. TY for your understanding🙏

Cheers, CryptoGlyn.🦆