Nov 12, 2026 9:00 PM
Verstappen analyzes the clash between Hamilton and Leclerc and points to the root of the problem: the coexistence of two leaders with title ambitions.
The clash between Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc in Mexico continues to give people something to talk about and Max Verstappen has not wanted to stay on the sidelines. The Dutch driver consulted about the incident that strained the internal relationship at Ferrari, did not limit himself to opining on the maneuver: he went directly to the structural root of the problem, for the four-time world champion what happened at the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez was not an isolated accident, but the symptom of a management decision that from his point of view, is condemned to repeat itself as long as the Scuderia maintains two drivers with leadership aspirations.
"If you simply had a clear number one and a clear number two, they would have gone through that corner first and second and would also have finished first and second, or maybe first and third but that is also fine. As a team you still score good points" Verstappen explained, drawing a hypothetical scenario that contrasts with what happened in Mexico where the fight between teammates cost them positions and valuable points. The Dutchman did not speak as a rival who benefits from others' chaos but as an observer who understands the internal dynamics of an elite team.
Verstappen's reflection acquires weight because he himself has been the beneficiary of a clear hierarchical structure at Red Bull: "I have said it before, many people don't agree with me but if I were team boss, if I had my own team, I would never sign two number one drivers because then these things happen. It is normal, one is not going to give way to the other because both believe they can win and I am like that too" he noted. The Dutchman does not judge the ambition of Hamilton or Leclerc; he understands it because he competes with the same mentality, but precisely for that reason he knows that without clear rules, the coexistence between two leaders ends up exploding.
The Red Bull driver also pointed to history as evidence: he recalled without naming them, the cases of Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello at Ferrari or Lewis Hamilton and Valtteri Bottas at Mercedes where an undisputed leader and a solid second driver built dynasties: "If you have a good car you don't need two number one drivers either, it is enough to have a decent second driver, throughout the history of Formula 1 it has also been clear that something like that works perfectly, even for years" he stated.
Related stories
Verstappen's stance raises an uncomfortable question for Ferrari: can a team win a title with two drivers who see themselves as equals? The Scuderia has not conquered the drivers' championship since 2007 nor the constructors' since 2008 and the pressure to return to the top is enormous. The bet on Hamilton and Leclerc sought precisely that: two top-level talents capable of returning Maranello to the top, but the price of that bet is an internal management that as Mexico demonstrated, can become a powder keg.
While Ferrari tries to put out the fire, Verstappen observes from a distance, faithful to a philosophy that has given him four titles. His message is clear: in Formula 1 hierarchy is not a defect, but a tool and the teams that ignore it, sooner or later, pay the bill.
Comments
Powered by RoundtableAn AI/DeFi-powered Enterprise Media Operating System. Learn more at Roundtable.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy




