The San Francisco Giants have several important decisions to make before the MLB trade deadline.

Much of the attention has centered on Luis Arraez, Willy Adames, Rafael Devers, and Matt Chapman.

Those names naturally stand out because of their contracts and the uncertainty surrounding the team’s direction.

The player who could reveal the Giants’ true plans, however, is Jung Hoo Lee.

Trading Arraez is easy to understand.

He is playing on a one-year contract, making him one of the most obvious trade candidates if San Francisco decides to sell.

Adames is another logical possibility.

His contract has become difficult to justify, and moving it would provide long-term financial flexibility.

The same discussion applies, to different degrees, to Devers and Chapman.

Both carry significant long-term commitments that could become obstacles if the Giants choose to reshape the roster.

Lee is different. He is younger. He remains affordable. He is also one of the team’s cornerstone players.

Lee has three years remaining on his contract after this season at $21 million per year. Considering his production, that represents solid value. Moving him would be about much more than clearing payroll.

Kiley McDaniel and Jeff Passan from ESPN recently evaluated the top trade candidates around MLB. They assigned Lee a 50% chance of being traded before the deadline. That immediately made him one of the most surprising names on their list.

McDaniel and Passan noted that moving the Giants’ highest-paid veterans could prove difficult because of the size of their contracts.

They also suggested the Giants would have a much better chance of creating a market if they decided to make Lee available.

“While the Giants’ desire to dump their high-profile players with high-priced contracts will run into plenty of resistance, they should be able to cobble together a market if they really are interested in moving Lee,” McDaniel and Passan wrote.

That possibility raises an important question. What direction does San Francisco want to take?

If the Giants believe they can contend over the next several seasons, keeping Lee makes perfect sense.

He is young enough to remain part of the team’s foundation. His contract also gives the organization long-term cost certainty.

If the Giants believe a complete rebuild is necessary, the conversation changes. In that scenario, Lee could become one of the organization’s most valuable trade chips.

Still, it would be surprising if the Giants moved him before making decisions on players such as Arraez, Adames, Devers, or Chapman.

Trading Lee would likely signal a full organizational reset rather than a simple roster adjustment.

That is why his situation deserves close attention over the coming weeks.

Lee’s game extends well beyond traditional offensive production. He consistently puts together competitive at-bats and rarely gives pitchers an easy out.

His contact skills allow him to pressure opposing defenses, while his instincts help him maximize every opportunity on the bases and in the field.

Defensively, he covers plenty of ground and takes efficient routes, giving his team stability in the outfield.

He also brings an energetic style that can change the pace of a game without needing to hit for power.

Those qualities make him the type of player contenders value because he contributes in multiple ways every night.

For the Giants, that versatility only strengthens the argument for keeping him unless they decide to completely reshape the franchise.

Don’t miss out on our ROUNDTABLE community and the latest news!

It’s completely free to join. Share your thoughts, engage with our Roundtable writers, and chat with fellow members.

Download the free Roundtable APP, and stay even more connected!