As the San Francisco Giants continue slipping further out of the National League postseason picture, the organization faces decisions that could shape the direction of the franchise for years to come.

At 31-44, San Francisco enters a stretch where immediate improvement is becoming increasingly necessary if the club hopes to remain relevant in the postseason conversation.

That reality naturally shifts attention toward the trade deadline.

When teams fall in the standings, difficult conversations usually follow. For the Giants, one of the biggest questions has centered on whether the organization should capitalize on the value of ace Logan Webb.

But, according to a new report, San Francisco appears to have reached the correct conclusion.

Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported that while the Giants continue discussing whether to become sellers at the deadline, Webb is not expected to be included in those conversations.

Rosenthal indicated that the organization currently has no plans to move its frontline starter.

That decision makes sense.

Webb has become far more than a productive pitcher.

He represents one of the few foundational pieces on a roster still searching for direction.

His recent form only reinforces the logic behind keeping him.

Webb is 2-0 with an 0.39 ERA and 0.61 WHIP in 23 innings over three starts in June, recording 18 strikeouts and issuing only one walk.

Those performances would certainly create substantial interest if San Francisco changed course.

However, moving a pitcher performing at that level while under team control would create as many questions as answers.

For a team attempting to remain competitive rather than beginning a full rebuild, keeping Webb preserves stability.

That does not mean no moves are coming.

Rosenthal identified second baseman Luis Arraez and starting pitcher Robbie Ray as the two Giants players most likely to be moved.

Arraez signed a one-year, $12 million contract and has continued improving defensively while hitting .321.

If traded, his remaining salary obligation would transfer to the acquiring team.

Ray presents another logical option. He owns a 4.07 ERA with 74 strikeouts in 79.2 innings across 15 appearances (14 starts) and could appeal to teams seeking experienced rotation depth.

Rosenthal also noted Matt Chapman as a theoretical possibility.

Still, that scenario remains difficult because Chapman possesses a no-trade clause and recently signed a six-year, $151 million contract.

Keeping Chapman and Webb together gives San Francisco recognizable cornerstones while evaluating the rest of the roster.

That may ultimately be the smarter approach.

Webb’s importance extends beyond numbers.

He consistently embraces pressure and carries the responsibility expected from a staff leader.

His competitiveness, preparation, and accountability help establish standards throughout the clubhouse.

Pitchers like Webb are difficult to replace, even when prospect returns look attractive.

For a Giants team searching for answers, deciding not to trade Webb appears to be one of the clearest right decisions available.

Don’t miss out on our ROUNDTABLE community and the latest news!

It’s completely free to join. Share your thoughts, engage with our Roundtable writers, and chat with fellow members.

Download the free Roundtable APP, and stay even more connected!