Marlins fans react to the launch of Marlins.TV, questioning pricing, blackout rules, and whether the new streaming model is worth it.
What’s your reaction to the new Marlins.TV streaming service?
The Miami Marlins hoped Marlins.TV would feel like a clean break from the blackout era. Instead, the early fan reaction suggests something else entirely: confusion, frustration, and a lingering question about whether this really fixes anything.
In partnership with Major League Baseball’s production studio, the Marlins announced that fans can now stream games directly through Marlins.TV. The in-market price is $100 per year or $19.99 per month, while out-of-market fans can subscribe for $200 per year or $29.99 per month. Season ticket holders get half off the yearly rate. Blackouts are reportedly eliminated for fans residing in Florida and a sliver of Alabama. Spring training games will stream free with an MLB.com account.
And notably, there is no ESPN Unlimited double paywall attached to Marlins.TV, as has been suggested across social media.
On paper, it reads like progress. But online, fans aren’t so sure.
“Seems very confusing and expensive,” one Reddit user wrote, capturing the essence of many early reactions. The issue isn’t just price -- it’s trust.
MLB has spent years asking fans to juggle regional sports networks, blackout maps, and layered subscriptions. Now, even with blackouts supposedly removed in-state, many fans are unsure how Marlins.TV interacts with traditional MLB.TV restrictions when the team travels.
One commenter tried to explain the difference between standard MLB.TV and the $200 out-of-market Marlins.TV option, admitting they “could be entirely wrong.”
That uncertainty reflects the broader problem: if fans can’t confidently explain what they’re buying, they hesitate to buy it.
Others were more direct. “They want people to go away from illegal streaming,” another fan wrote, “well, they are not doing a very good job to convince people not to do it.” The sentiment surfaced repeatedly -- if the goal is to simplify access and curb piracy, clarity and affordability need to feel obvious.
In-state fans also voiced frustration over what they see as an uneven system. Some argued that residents should automatically have easier access to their home-state team without extra hoops. Out-of-state fans, meanwhile, are calculating whether $200 per season makes sense on top of existing cable bills or NFL Sunday Ticket subscriptions. One fan admitted they’ll likely watch the games already included in their package and find “other ways” to watch the rest.
For the Marlins, Marlins.TV represents modernization and greater control, even if it means less guaranteed broadcasting revenue. For fans, though, the reaction underscores a simple truth: access matters, but transparency matters more.
The Marlins may have eliminated one layer of blackouts. What they haven’t eliminated -- at least yet -- is the skepticism.
ㅤ
Join the Community! Don't miss out on our ROUNDTABLE community and the latest news! It's completely free to join. Share your thoughts, engage with our Roundtable writers, and chat with fellow members.
Download the free Roundtable APP, and stay even more connected!