Powered by Roundtable
The No-Trade Clause That Cost the Red Sox Alex Bregman cover image

New reporting reveals Boston didn’t lose Bregman on money, but on trust, security, and a no-trade line they refused to cross.

New reporting reveals Boston didn’t lose Bregman on money, but on trust, security, and a no-trade line they refused to cross

For weeks, the Alex Bregman saga in Boston has been framed as a numbers game.

A valuation gap. A disciplined-to-a-fault front office. A Cubs offer the Red Sox wouldn’t match.

Pete Abraham’s reporting in The Boston Globe adds a critical layer that reframes the entire outcome - and it has far less to do with dollars than with trust, security, and how Boston chose to negotiate.

According to Abraham, Bregman’s intention was never to leave. His plan was to stay in Boston for five more years.

He embraced Fenway’s daily intensity. He leaned into an unofficial leadership role last season. He saw the Red Sox as a chance to chase a third World Series ring while reshaping a legacy still tethered, fairly or not, to Houston’s 2017 scandal. Just as importantly, Boston worked for his family. Bregman, his wife Reagan, and their two young sons valued the organization’s family-friendly environment and stability around the ballpark.

That context matters, because it explains the sticking point that ultimately ended the relationship:

A full no-trade clause.

Bregman wasn’t chasing leverage. He was chasing certainty.

As Abraham reports, Bregman was prepared to accept a five-year, $165 million deal - right in the range of Boston’s reported final framework - if it came with no-trade protection and a deferral structure that preserved the contract’s present-day value.

The no-trade clause wasn’t about ego. It was about roots.

He didn’t want to settle his family in Boston only to wake up one morning as a cost-controlled asset under a new regime.

And history supports that fear.

Jul 20, 2025; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Boston Red Sox third baseman Alex Bregman (2) points after he hit a three run home run against the Chicago Cubs during the eighth inning at Wrigley Field. (Matt Marton/Imagn Images)Jul 20, 2025; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Boston Red Sox third baseman Alex Bregman (2) points after he hit a three run home run against the Chicago Cubs during the eighth inning at Wrigley Field. (Matt Marton/Imagn Images)

MORE RED SOX STORIES:

Craig Breslow is just over two years into the job. The three executives before him averaged barely over four years. Philosophies change quickly in Boston. So do priorities.

The Red Sox didn’t meet Bregman there.

Boston balked at the no-trade clause and insisted on deferrals that pushed real money further down the road. According to Abraham, Bregman was told this was the final offer. Take it or leave it.

That moment lines up cleanly with everything else we’ve learned.

On the Foul Territory YouTube Channel, AJ Pierzynski described a front office that drew a hard line early and refused to budge. MassLive detailed a guarantee ceiling in the low-$160 million range. The Cubs, meanwhile, offered clarity: five years, $175 million, cleaner deferrals, and full no-trade protection.

Bregman chose certainty over friction.

It’s important to be precise here. The Red Sox didn’t lowball him. They didn’t disappear. They didn’t panic. They negotiated exactly how they wanted to negotiate - structurally, cautiously, and on their terms.

But structure has a human cost.

As Abraham discussed, Chris Sale once received full no-trade rights from this organization. He eventually waived them when Breslow moved him to Atlanta. Whether Boston now has a blanket aversion to no-trade clauses or whether this stance was specific to Bregman remains unclear. Breslow declined to comment on that aspect, per Abraham.

What is clear is this:

The Red Sox treated Bregman like an opportunity, not a necessity. They prioritized control, flexibility, and future optionality over emotional buy-in.

Chicago did the opposite.

That choice didn’t just cost Boston a third baseman. It defined everything that followed - the pivot talk, the Eugenio Suarez interest, the Rob Bradford report about doubling down on run prevention, and the hesitation around another high-variance bat like Bo Bichette.

Bregman didn’t leave because Boston wouldn’t pay him.

He left because Boston wouldn’t fully commit to him.

And once that message landed, no late stretch - no matter how close - was ever going to bring him back.

Trust matters.

Jul 20, 2025; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Boston Red Sox third baseman Alex Bregman (2), right, high fives outfielder Roman Anthony (19) after they score on Bregman’s three run home run against the Chicago Cubs during the eighth inning at Wrigley Field. (Matt Marton/Imagn Images)Jul 20, 2025; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Boston Red Sox third baseman Alex Bregman (2), right, high fives outfielder Roman Anthony (19) after they score on Bregman’s three run home run against the Chicago Cubs during the eighth inning at Wrigley Field. (Matt Marton/Imagn Images)

JOIN THE CONVERSATION:

Remember to join our RED SOX on ROUNDTABLE community, which is FREE! You can post your own thoughts, in text or video form, and you can engage with our Roundtable staff, as well as other Red Sox fans. If prompted to download the Roundtable APP, that's free too!

Tom Carroll is a contributor for Roundtable, with boots-on-the-ground coverage of all things Boston sports. He's a senior digital content producer for WEEI.com, and a native of Lincoln, RI.