In some NBA circles, the concept of "drafting for fit" is blasphemous.  How could you? Take the best player available. Always. It doesn't matter if you have three starting-caliber wings. If the best player on the board is a wing, you add a fourth.

It's a justifiable take, but it can be oversimplified. If you think that one player may be a hair better than another, but they're in the same tier, you may want to take the player who best fits your roster.

It's something many teams will be considering ahead of the 2026 NBA Draft. Between Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and AJ Dybansta, there's a clear top tier. That said, the consensus on the ordering seems to change weekly. As such, teams that land in the top three may be inclined to draft the player they think best fits their roster.

If the Atlanta Hawks land one of those picks, there's no question who the best fit is.

It's Peterson.

The other two players are forwards. Boozer is a 4/5, whereas Dybansta is closer to a 3/4 or a 4/3, but they're both ultimately forwards.

So is Jalen Johnson. Nobody is suggesting that neither Boozer or Dybsansta can't be better than Johnson, but it is an awfully high bar. Statistically speaking, if a GM could hypothetically guarantee a prospect would reach Johnson's level, that prospect would be a number one pick in just about any draft.

The same can't be said for Jonathan Kuminga, but he has been a revelation in Atlanta. Perhaps you could draft the shot-creating Dybansta under the assumption that you'll likely move Kuminga eventually, but that feels messy. Boozer should be virtually a non-option as a ball-dominant playmaking four in Johnson's vein.

READ MORE:  The Secret Behind the Atlanta Hawks' 8-1 Run Since the All-Star Break

Then, there's Peterson. He's perfect.

Yes, he averages a paltry 1.8 assists per game. Fans should be wary of college stats. The Jayhawks' offense is designed to maximize Peterson's scoring. By all appearances, he'll be one of the best scoring guards in the NBA at a bare minimum.

His playmaking is better than the stats suggest, but it's a bit lacking. That could be a problem for some teams, but for a Hawks team that gets 8.0 assists per contest from Johnson, it's a non-issue.

This is the player the Hawks need. Unless they determine that one of the forwards is substantially better than Peterson, they should be circling in on Peterson. With the top of the draft constantly changing, it's possible that it would only take a top-three pick for the Hawks to secure his services.

If they have that opportunity, the fit should be too strong to resist.