It's never fun to say goodbye, but it could be time for these youngsters to part ways with the Jazz.
Admitting defeat in an investment is among the most brutal feelings in the world, and doubly so for an NBA franchise, whose multi-million dollar gamble on up-and-coming talent could crash and burn in humiliating -- and public -- fashion. The Utah Jazz are reaching that point with some of the outliers of their youth movement, and the 2026-27 season may just be their last in Salt Lake City.
Every basketball prospect comes with their own unique set of needs, accommodations, and considerations. I believe that every prospect arrives under one of three categories: projects, coin-flips, and day-one contributors.
The NBA Projects
Projects are players who are selected with the knowledge that they are not NBA-ready at the time of their arrival, but possess the tools and potential to piece together a remarkable professional career. These players are granted more wiggle room, plenty of space to make mistakes in the name of education. The players who are a few years away.
For example, some players, like Giannis Antetokounmpo, may not be especially effective in their first few seasons of NBA basketball, but eventually develop into stars thanks to their physical gifts and patience from the front office.
Cody Williams fits into this category, and has unfortunately showed little evidence of being a Giannis in waiting.
A very poor shooter who lacks the physicality to impose his will inside the three-point arc, the Jazz tested his playmaking skills by giving him control of the offense during Summer League. It was a disaster.
Though he showed improvement as a jump shooter with a stronger frame, Williams will need to show drastic improvement and real NBA upside this season if he wants to keep his spot with the Jazz.
The Coin-Flips
These are the standard young player archetypes -- the prospects who will either work out at the next level or slip into obscurity. While not every one of these prospects is necessarily boom-or-bust, they're a gamble all the same. Andrew Wiggins was selected to be an MVP candidate, but peaked as an all-star. That was a failure in his team's eyes, but that doesn't mean he has no value.
For the Jazz, their coin flip on the chopping block is Brice Sensabaugh, perhaps the most valuable player drafted by Utah during their rebuild outside of George, Bailey, and Peterson.
He's an incredible scorer, and the Jazz picked him up with the 28th overall pick. Off the bench, he's proved capable of scoring off the catch and creating his own shot, and Utah should be very pleased with his development through three seasons.
He could part ways with the Jazz this year. Not because he's struggled, but on the contrary, he's been excellent and could net Utah some great trade value if they want to add a veteran scorer in his place in hopes of competing in the playoffs. I believe Utah should hold on to Sensabaugh, but that's not my call.
The Day-One Contributors
Typically older players, day-one contributors are brought in as NBA-ready players, who will feed winning basketball from their first days with the team. The downside to these players? They're often closer to being a finished product and have low upside as a result.
Kyle Filipowski is a fascinating player for the Jazz. A steal in the early second round of his draft class, Flip has been one of the most consistently performing youngsters on the roster, but his defensive struggles have kept him on the bench when a healthy lineup buries him in the depth chart.
He's a good player -- no denying the value Utah got with a second-round pick in Filipowski -- but it's hard to say whether the Jazz view him as a critical piece in the rotation long-term.


