Should The Washington Wizards Bring Back Russell Westbrook?

The possibility of Russell Westbrook returning to the Washington Wizards is certainly intriguing. Westbrook had one of the most memorable individual seasons in franchise history, breaking Oscar Robertson's all-time triple-double record while wearing a Wizards jersey and helping drag Washington into the playoffs. He's one of the greatest point guards the NBA has ever seen, and after a productive season on a veteran minimum contract, bringing him back wouldn't be an expensive gamble.

That said, there's arguments to be made on both sides.

Maybe the biggest hesitation for a move like this is simple: this season isn’t solely about chasing wins. It’s also about development. Throughout the rebuild, general manager Will Dawkins has consistently emphasized patience. At his end-of-season press conference, he reiterated that “the train hasn't even left the station yet.” Washington drafted guys like Bub Carrington and Will Riley because they believe those players can become foundational pieces. Ideally, Dawkins wants to spend next season giving them every opportunity to grow through meaningful NBA minutes.

On paper, it makes sense. Westbrook only made around $2 million last season, meaning he could once again be signed on a minimum contract as a one-year stopgap veteran. He's an unquestioned culture setter who plays with relentless intensity every night, and there's real value in having someone with his work ethic inside a young locker room. In my opinion, he definitely fits the Will Dawkins veteran criteria as a respected veteran that can come in and install winning habits into this young core. The Wizards have valued that tremendously through their rebuild, and Westbrook certainly fits the bill in that aspect. 

Westbrook is still capable of contributing decently. Last season with the Kings, the 37-year-old averaged 15.0 points, 5.4 rebounds and 6.7 assists while shooting 42% from the field and 33% from three. More importantly, he still played nearly 29 minutes per game, suggesting he believes he's still a legitimate rotation player rather than simply a veteran mentor glued to the bench.

Last season, Bub Carrington averaged 27.7 minutes per game, while rookie Will Riley averaged roughly 22 minutes. Those are two players Washington needs to evaluate and develop. If Westbrook returns expecting to play 25 to 30 minutes every night, as his recent production would possibly justify asking for this, those minutes have to come from somewhere. There's a path for Westbrook and Carrington to share the floor together on the second unit, too, but it would tighten minutes while also providing upgraded veteran experience to the unit.

Even more concerning is how he would affect the offense. Last year, Westbrook posted a 37% on-ball percentage last season, placing him in the 83rd percentile league-wide. He's still an extremely ball-dominant guard, and that's simply how he's always played. While Bub can certainly function off the ball, one of the organization's biggest developmental goals should be seeing if he can possibly improve his responsibilities as a primary playmaker. The same goes for Will Riley, who many fans hope can eventually develop into a point forward capable of initiating offense.

Adding Westbrook risks taking those on-ball reps away. Now, if Westbrook is fully willing to compete for minutes, mentor the young guards, and even accept a reduced role if Bub and Riley outperform him, I'd be much more open to the signing. Competition breeds greatness, and having a future Hall of Famer push your young players every day could accelerate their growth.

The biggest concern is whether that's the role Westbrook actually wants. He's coming off a solid season and has earned the respect to expect real playing time. Not many would blame him for feeling that way, but how much bigger of a role are teams willing to offer the largely rotational piece?

Westbrook is ultra competitive and may not be willing to be relegated to the bench during his final years in the NBA. Also, the Wizards may still need to make a consolidation trade, with players like D'Angelo Russell potentially on the move elsewhere and young players such as Cam Whitmore and Jaden Hardy searching for larger opportunities. But regardless of how the roster shakes out, Washington's first priority must continue to be to develop its young core.

Westbrook would undoubtedly help breed the team's competitiveness and winning culture. The biggest question would be whether he willing to take a reduced role if he gets outplayed by our young core. And if he does play, would his playing time be a disservice to the core around him? Lots of important questions to answer before you make this move in my opinion.

Wizards Roundtable also offers a fan community. We’d love to have you join us to talk all things Wizards. Create an account, click the “Join” button at the top of the page to join our free community and follow for all of our coverage, analysis and more!