A legal ruling allowing a player to gamble on his own team sparks chaos, threatening to strip college football of its integrity and leave officials powerless.
It’s possible that, for the first time, when college football games kick off, you may find yourself questioning whether what your eyes are seeing on the field is real.
By now, everyone knows what took place inside a courtroom in Texas on Monday. A judge ruled that a player who admitted to betting not only on his own sport but also on his own team could continue playing. The judge’s decision challenges years of understanding from college and professional athletics that betting on your own sport, let alone your own team, will be the end of your career if caught.
ESPN’s Dan Wetzel, after the ruling, took the time to “congratulate” both Brendan Sorsby and Texas Tech on the win. Unfortunately for both, he was being facetious, stating, “Simply, this case is ridiculous, short-sighted, and illogical.”
But this is where college sports have gotten today. And make no mistake, the chaos may just be starting. Considering the Big 12 is discussing the possibility of further penalties, while the Texas Attorney General and Brendan Sorsby’s attorney have already threatened legal action if the conference tries to punish either Texas Tech or Sorsby, it remains to be seen whether any additional action will be taken.
This era of college athletics has come to be known as the Wild West, but even the Wild West had some form of rules. This era is evolving into something even more chaotic, an era with no oversight because there is no way to enforce any rules.
If no one has any power to enforce the rules, the obvious question becomes: are there any rules left to follow?
What Sorsby and now Texas Tech are doing is challenging the integrity of the game. If you can’t believe what you are seeing on the field is honest competition, then what separates it from the WWE?
It’s why not being allowed to bet on your sport, let alone your team, is considered the one unbreakable rule, and if you do, at least in any of the four major sports, the punishment is the death penalty, never being allowed to play the sport again.
In college athletics, as of now, it’s only a two-game suspension. The ruling and the precedent it sets have caused outrage across the sports world. From schools banning their athletic departments from playing the Red Raiders to the Big 12 having to hold discussions on what, if anything, can be done without watching another punishment evaporate in a courtroom.
It’s why people like ACC commissioner Jim Phillips called the ruling “eroding the integrity of our process.” Or why an athletic director from the Big 12 called the ruling “disgusting,” while adding, “We officially lost our soul.”
The point is, there is no way to prove whether, over the last three seasons, Sorsby did or didn't shave points. And that’s why the rules exist. And the fact that the NCAA couldn’t find a way to win what appeared to be an open-and-shut case raises questions about its ability to enforce any rule.
“If you cannot govern the matters that are in your lane, you don’t exist,” Josh Pate said. “You’re just four letters. The NCAA is just kind of four letters now.”
“If you can't enforce this rule,” Joel Klatt added, “then what can you enforce?"
But that’s what the NCAA has been reduced to through constant court losses that have taken away their authority. From legal battles involving Tennessee and Virginia to cases involving Diego Pavia and Tatuo Martinson, the NCAA has seemingly watched its power slip away in the courts, with no way of stop it.
Which brings us back to Florida State.
And with everything that has transpired, do Michael Alford, Mike Norvell, or anyone involved in Florida State’s negotiated settlement with the NCAA look foolish now?
After the ruling, Pate said, “If at any point in recent history as a player or a coach or an institution you self-reported violations or you admitted to violations or you just accepted NCAA sanctions, how foolish must you feel?”
And while he wasn’t taking a shot at Florida State, not many programs as big as Florida State decide to go along with the NCAA.
To accept a punishment for Level II recruiting violations involving Name, Image, and Likeness from an organization that can’t even punish a player for gambling on his own team looks questionable. Why accept two years of probation, financial fines, scholarship reductions, recruiting restrictions, and the one that hurts the most: a mandatory disassociation from the involved booster and a one-year disassociation from the specific NIL collective involved?
It now looks like a decision that effectively hamstrung the program, preventing it from competing under the same conditions as other top programs. If they had continued to fight and won, the last two disappointing seasons may have been avoided, and Norvell might not be on the hot seat in college football.
Pete Nakos explained why Florida State has struggled in recruiting out of high school and the portal the last few years.
“If you go back, it’s interesting because you think of that 2023 season Florida State was a top 10 team in spending,” Nakos said. “They were at the forefront of NIL.”
In January 2024, the NCAA officially announced the agreement with Florida State.
Nakos adds that after that, things weren’t great at Florida State, then the House settlement came, and “athletic director Michael Alford kind of tapped the brakes a little bit on outside spending because he wants to make sure they follow the rules. And what you have right now at Florida State is a program that is not the highest funded in the sport.”
Instead, Florida State has been playing by a set of rules no one had the power to enforce. By doing so, the talent discrepancy has allowed other programs to move ahead while the Seminoles have been forced to struggle with questionable decisions at positions because they couldn’t compete financially.
Florida State deserves credit for accepting the consequences after doing something wrong. But when no one else is, was it the foolish move? It appears so.
With the new precedent of just going to court, and the NCAA seemingly stripped of any ability to enforce rules, it wouldn’t come as any surprise if programs or players with millions of dollars on the line look to push the line even further now.
And the only way to stop it, is if the adults in the room finally step up and take the necessary action to address the chaos and restore stability, accountability, rules, and sound governance back to a sport that has gone any of it for too long.
Join our ROUNDTABLE community! It's free to join. Share your thoughts, engage with our Roundtable writers, and chat with fellow members.
