Quiet, calculated, and far from flashy — the Detroit Lions attacked free agency with purpose. But while key additions bring stability, one glaring decision could come back to haunt them when it matters most.
The Detroit Lions opened free agency with a measured but productive approach, prioritizing depth and value over splashy signings. While some teams across the league made aggressive moves early, Detroit stayed true to its long-term roster-building philosophy under general manager Brad Holmes. Based on the team’s track record, it would not be surprising if the Lions remain relatively quiet until after the NFL draft, when roster needs become clearer.
Holmes has consistently emphasized building through the draft, using free agency to complement rather than define the roster. That strategy appears to be in full effect again this offseason. After the first wave of signings, Detroit has addressed a few key areas while leaving flexibility to evaluate remaining needs following the draft. The result is a free agency period that has featured both positive additions and a few questionable decisions.
Best moves
Detroit’s most impactful move was signing center Cade Mays to a three-year, $25 million contract. The Lions faced instability at center last season after the unexpected retirement of Frank Ragnow. In response, Detroit shifted veteran guard Graham Glasgow to the position, a move that ultimately proved costly. Glasgow struggled to replicate his usual level of play, resulting in one of the weakest seasons of his career.
Mays provides an immediate upgrade. At 6-foot-6 and 325 pounds, he brings size, strength and versatility to the offensive line. His presence should help stabilize the interior and restore consistency to one of the team’s most important units.
Another notable addition is running back Isiah Pacheco, who joins Detroit on a one-year, $1.8 million deal. Pacheco, formerly of the Kansas City Chiefs, brings championship experience after contributing to two Super Bowl-winning teams. He effectively replaces David Montgomery at a significantly lower cost.
Pacheco’s skill set fits well within Detroit’s offense. Known for his aggressive running style, he consistently gains tough yardage and has a reputation for falling forward to extend plays. In addition, his pass protection ability makes him a reliable option on all three downs. Given his production and affordability, the move represents strong value for the Lions.
Worst moves
Detroit’s most questionable decision was not an addition, but rather a departure. The Lions chose not to re-sign edge rusher Al-Quadin Muhammad, who later agreed to a one-year, $6 million contract with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The deal appears team-friendly, raising questions about why Detroit did not make a stronger effort to retain him.
Muhammad addressed the situation publicly, indicating the Lions were prepared to move on. His departure leaves a noticeable gap along the defensive line, particularly in the pass rush. At present, standout defensive end Aidan Hutchinson remains the focal point of the unit, with limited proven depth behind him.
While free agency is ongoing, Detroit has yet to add a significant pass rusher. That absence suggests the team may look to address the position in the draft before pursuing additional veteran help. A post-draft signing remains a realistic possibility, especially if the Lions identify a need for more immediate production.
Overall assessment
Through the first week of free agency, Detroit has taken a steady and calculated approach. The Lions avoided overpaying in a competitive market while still making meaningful additions to key positions. The signings of Mays and Pacheco highlight a focus on value and roster balance rather than headline-grabbing deals.
At the same time, the decision to let Muhammad walk introduces some uncertainty, particularly along the defensive front. Whether that choice proves costly will depend on how effectively the Lions address the pass rush in the coming weeks.
Overall, Detroit’s performance in free agency earns a solid “B” grade. The team improved in important areas without compromising its long-term flexibility. However, questions remain, and the next phase of the offseason, including the draft will ultimately determine whether this approach leads to sustained success.