May 14, 2026 4:49 PM
DeFi is fundamentally more dangerous than centralized lending. While enthusiasts claim smart contracts eliminate human error, the $292 million KelpDAO exploit proves that "composability risk" can collapse the entire system in an instant. Meanwhile, a centralized, Bitcoin-only model just earned an investment-grade rating from S&P Global with zero losses over eight years. It turns out trusting a company is safer than trusting code. Is DeFi's lack of counterparty risk actually worth the constant threat of total loss?
This summary was generated by AI
1
Comments
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy


