Michael Saylor just called BIP-110 a Bitcoin iatrogenic proposal

Bitcoin’s greatest threat isn't "spam" like Ordinals; it’s the attempt to ban them. BIP-110 is an iatrogenic proposal—a "cure" that causes more harm than the disease. By invalidating valid, fee-paying transactions to stop blockchain bloat, we are destroying Bitcoin’s fundamental neutrality. Once we encode subjective preferences into consensus rules, the protocol's credibility is dead. Is protecting node costs worth sacrificing Bitcoin's censorship resistance? What's your take?
This summary was generated by AI