Michael Saylor warns against changing Bitcoin's core rules

Any attempt to change Bitcoin’s rules to prevent "disapproved" usage is a statist impulse that betrays the core principles of liberty and property rights. Proposals like BIP 110, which seek "monetary purity by fiat," use the exact same logic of central control that Bitcoin was built to replace. If we allow developers to dictate how individuals use their money, we’ve already lost. Is protocol-level restriction a necessary evolution or a total betrayal? What’s your take?
This summary was generated by AI