Actually, owning a massive amount of XRP gives Ripple zero control over the network. Tribalism is toxic, and the "XRP Army" needs to accept that the future is multi-chain, not a single-token monopoly. Since the ledger isn't Proof of Stake, Ripple's holdings don't translate to power over the protocol. Can a network really be decentralized if one company owns the majority of the supply, or is the "control" argument just a myth? Is it time to kill the centralization debate?
This summary was generated by AI
1