San Francisco billionaire slammed by Gen Z son over surveillance support

Public safety is not worth the cost of total surveillance, and we should rather live with crime than be constantly tracked. Despite investing millions into San Francisco’s real-time police surveillance hubs, drones, and license-plate readers, the trade-off is sparking a fierce divide. Even my own son argues that he’d rather have the crime than the surveillance. Is the promise of a safer city worth the total loss of privacy? Or is he right to choose crime over cameras?
This summary was generated by AI