
AFC Bournemouth’s adoption of INXS’ "Never Tear Us Apart" has split opinion among fans. While some praise the unity and spectacle it brings, others argue it drowns out organic chants. Is this the start of a new tradition - or a barrier to authentic atmosphere at Dean Court?
As AFC Bournemouth continue to evolve on and off the pitch, a new debate has emerged among supporters: the introduction of "Never Tear Us Apart" by INXS as a pre-match anthem. Like most changes to matchday tradition, it has divided opinion - though not without good reason on either side.
At first glance, the visual impact on Wednesday's pre-match instalment was hard to ignore. Scarves held aloft, flags waving across the stands, and coordinated audio-visual build-up created what some fans described as a "spine-tingling" moment.
© Steve ShovlarFor a club often criticised for inconsistent atmosphere, this felt like a deliberate attempt to unify the crowd. One supporter noted that, while "gimmicky", the combination of music, imagery, and shared experience "looked incredible" and, importantly, felt like something bigger than the sum of its parts.
There’s also a broader context here. Many clubs have long-established anthems that help define their identity - Liverpool with You’ll Never Walk Alone, Manchester City with Blue Moon, and Nottingham Forest with Mull of Kintyre. These traditions didn’t appear overnight; they were built, often gradually, until they became synonymous with the club. From that perspective, Bournemouth’s move can be seen less as an imposition and more as the first step in creating something lasting.
Supporters in favour of what they heard on Wednesday night point to a practical reality: Dean Court has, at times, been quiet.
REUTERS/Ian WaltonSeveral fans admitted that the crowd can be reactive rather than proactive, with noise levels before the game being inconsistent, and during it - rising only when the team is already on top. In that light, the club stepping in to "take ownership" of the pre-match atmosphere isn’t entirely unreasonable. If organic noise isn’t consistently there, a structured routine might help bridge the gap - at least initially.
However, the criticisms are just as compelling. The most common complaint is that the anthem interrupts rather than enhances existing fan culture. Chants like "Flying High" or "Minus 17 (Eddie Had a Dream)" which have grown organically over time, risk being drowned out by the tannoy.
One fan described it bluntly: "That could have been a real hair-on-the-neck moment… instead it was silenced".
There’s also a question of authenticity.
Unlike the anthems at other clubs, some supporters suggest that "Never Tear Us Apart" currently lacks a deep-rooted connection to Bournemouth. For some, it feels like a committee-driven decision rather than something born from the terraces. Football atmospheres, at their best, are messy, spontaneous, and fan-led - qualities that can be difficult to replicate through a pre-planned soundtrack.
Others though have suggested that it is no less generic than when Bournemouth fans sing "Wise Men Say", and argue that the lyrics of "Never Tear Us Apart" - when analysed - do resonate massively with being a Cherry.
Even among sceptics, there’s a degree of acceptance that the club faces a difficult balancing act. With an ageing fanbase, limited stadium capacity, and only a core of a few thousand consistently vocal supporters, generating a sustained atmosphere is no easy task. The introduction of an anthem, along with visual elements like flags and scarves, may be an imperfect solution - but it is at least an attempt.
Perhaps the most reasonable middle ground lies in how fans respond.
If the pre-match build-up becomes club-led, then the ninety minutes that follow remain firmly in supporter control. As one poster put it, fans need to "plough our energies into the game itself, when the players actually need it".
In other words, the anthem doesn’t have to replace organic support - it can simply set the stage for it.
Ultimately, whether "Never Tear Us Apart" becomes a cherished tradition or a short-lived experiment will depend less on the speakers at Dean Court and more on the voices in the stands.


