Oct 16, 2026 5:01 PM
The performance gap between Esteban Ocon and Oliver Bearman in Singapore raised questions within Haas. While the Frenchman attributed part of the difference to different components, the Briton expressed surprise at that version.
Haas’ 2026 season is entering a decisive stretch, with two drivers heading into the championship's final races in very different situations. Oliver Bearman is establishing himself as a future bet, while Esteban Ocon is in his final races with the team. In that context, the Singapore Grand Prix added an unexpected episode involving both drivers' equipment.
The discussion emerged after a pointless race for the American team. Bearman finished twelfth, and Ocon crossed the line immediately behind him in thirteenth place. Although they finished close together, the Frenchman described a significant speed difference that, in his view, was not mainly due to setup. Ocon explained that he started the race with a strong launch and made several overtakes, but he soon lost the ability to maintain pace. He pointed to the lack of grip and the medium tires overheating when he pushed; in his view, his teammate could demand more from the car without facing the same limitations.
His explanation focused on technical development; according to him, Haas had only one upgrade unit available for Singapore and decided to fit it to Bearman’s car. The Frenchman said both cars had similar setups, but differences in their components explained part of the Briton’s advantage. He also said that during the opening laps, Bearman was running about a second faster and could make progress even when Ocon was several positions ahead; his comments raised a sensitive issue for any team: how upgrades are distributed when there aren't enough parts to equip both cars.
However, the story took a different turn when the Briton’s response became known. When journalists asked about those supposed additions, Bearman reacted with surprise and asked whether they meant new parts on his car. He then avoided expanding on the subject, but he also did not explicitly deny that he was running different elements.
The uncertainty adds to recent precedents; Haas acknowledged during the year that its cars had struggled to deliver consistent performance. In addition, at the Italian Grand Prix, Bearman received the only available Ferrari engine upgrade unit; at the time, team principal Ayao Komatsu recalled that Ocon had previously been given priority for other upgrades.
The sporting contrast also highlights the issue. Bearman has 23 points compared to Ocon’s seven and has achieved better qualifying results. Haas has already confirmed that the Frenchman will not continue as a full-time driver in 2027, although he still intends to remain involved in Formula 1, even through a reserve role. At a time when sporting decisions are being made, any discrepancy over equipment matters particularly to those involved.
For now, no public technical explanation makes it possible to determine whether Bearman actually debuted an upgrade in Singapore or whether there was a misunderstanding about the specifications. The difference between the accounts does not prove favoritism, but it leaves an important clarification pending regarding communication and development management at Haas.
Comments
Powered by RoundtableBuilt on infrastructure designed for real-time media. Learn more at RTB.io.© Roundtable 2026. By using this site you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy



